 | | EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Eric Sophie
|
| | | I was browsing the latest LEGO Shop at Home Catalog (Fall 2006) during dinner and I was noticing set number (URL) #7712> appears to have a new canopy. It looks like a nice one: (URL) Cool right? e (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Yes, it is cool, but I don't think it's particularly new, see (URL) here>. HTH ROSCO (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | (...) DOH!!! ...and to think I already (URL) 'd> them. hahaha (URL) (...) :) (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Charlie Citrin
|
| | | | | (...) That canopy has been out since '02 when the Starwars Episode II sets came out. -chuck- (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | Ahh I see now. Sure looks nice in the catalog. drool drool (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | | (...) -pic removed- (...) Sorry man, it's a SW canopy. The angle of that pic is messing with the image somewhat. (URL) Inv> (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Eric Sophie
|
| | | | | | (...) Ahh I see it in this picture now: (URL) haha kinda looks like my (URL) Wrecker>. e (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | (...) Actually, that canopy made its debut in 2002 in a few SW sets: (URL) think the set you linked is available at TRU. -Rob www.brickmodder.net www.lifelites.com (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: EXO-FORCE - #7712 New Canopy? —Patrick McFarland
|
| | | | (...) Eh, honestly, I can't think of a good use for it. Its the wrong shape. If it was longer, then it'd make a good aircraft streamlined canopy.... if it didn't bubble out like it does, then it'd be great for more bulky craft and robots and (...) (18 years ago, 11-Sep-06, to lugnet.inv)
|
| | | | |
