 | | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs —Mark Rideout
|
| | | In lugnet.harrypotter, David Eaton writes: <snip> (...) So for clarification on the findings, 4706 does\can have a random defective part in it. I have a least one on the set that I have (Richard Marchetti also found one in his). It is not specific (...) (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) I see that David Wertz reported one in his copy of 4706 ( (URL) ), but also Richard? I must have missed his post to that effect... Too bad it's in both sets :( I had hoped it would only be specific to one... DaveE (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs —Mark Rideout
|
| | | | (...) I have not idea why I said Richard. Yes it was David - I was looking at the wrong post when I check to see who it was from. -mark (23 years ago, 20-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A closer look at defective spiral stairs —Doyle Nelson
|
| | | | I just purchased 7 sets of stairs from the 4709 set and all the stairs were OK I purchased 2 sets before that but they were not built so I could comfirm. It seem to me that the majority of bad stairs are in the smaller set. Its totally random. Mine (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
