 | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Josh Baakko
| | | | (...) I'm not saying you're wrong, but if seemed funny that Lego would show off stuff like taht and not tell you that you couldn't say anything, unless they were hoping you would!? Josh (...) (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Mike Timm
| | | | | On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:04:54 GMT, "Josh Baakko" <shi_web@hotmail.com> wrote: <snippage> (...) Working for a company that sells LEGO(1), and having talked to a rep in the past (2) I'll make this speculation. I'd say that the rep was trying educate a (...) (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Jeff Jardine
| | | | | | (...) Oh man... This must be one of those situations where a spell-checker has gone horribly wrong. If not, I really feel sorry for patrons of a store where an employee showed excrement all over a product line. I'd feel even more sorry for the poor (...) (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Josh Baakko
| | | | | | | | (...) Yeah Josh (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Mike Timm
| | | | | | | (...) DOH! Bad spell checker, bad! I meant excitement, opps... Mike (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) I'd heard that the LEGO selection at that TRU stunk, but I really had no idea. --Todd (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Mike Timm
| | | | | | | | (...) It is time for me to slink away now.... I am guilty of blindly clicking change on the spell checker without selecting the correct line... sorry. Mike (23 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Paul Gardosik
| | | | | | | (...) No, the lego section at TRU rocks. They get stuff in months before other places. They're the only place in my area that has Alpha Team. (23 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Todd Lehman
| | | | | | (...) I wondered why the LEGO selection at that TRU stunk. --Todd (23 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Tony Kilaras
| | | | | What?!?! Excrement? "Mike Timm" <mtimm@usinternet.com> wrote in message news:tka8ctc46ttu8u9...4ax.com... (...) they (...) (23 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: new stuff for 2001 —Mike Timm
| | | | | (...) It is what I currently think of my use of the spell checker. See my other posts. Mike (23 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | | |
