| |
Well, they probably hire people to sit and click on the "awesome" button. If
there was a negative option, I would have chosen that. The TLG website is
and will always be bad, unless they start to use plain html.
--Tobias
> <snip of a well writen criticism of www.lego.com>
>
> While navigating the site I found a poll that gives you three options as to
> what you think of the new site (of course none of them are negative!!!). • The
> poll is at...
>
> http://www.lego.com/coolclicks/
>
> And here are the current results. (The poll blew up Netscape Navigator on • me
> so I got this with IE).
>
> Just awesome - give me more! 72 %
>
> It's better than it was 17 %
>
> It's about the same as the old LEGO.com 11 %
>
> Number of votes: 2298
>
>
> Who do you think those 72% are (worried LEGO web designers if you ask me).
>
> This site is a travesty and I just wish LEGO had a way for you to give them
> constructive critisizm. I did make a guess and have tried to E-mail
> webmaster@lego.com but I don't even know if this is a valid E-mail address • or
> not.
>
> Oh well...
>
> Eric
>
> Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail
>
> The New England LEGO Users Group
> http://www.nelug.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Criticisms of the new LEGO web-site
|
| <snip of a well writen criticism of www.lego.com> While navigating the site I found a poll that gives you three options as to what you think of the new site (of course none of them are negative!!!). The poll is at... (URL) here are the current (...) (25 years ago, 18-Oct-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
