 | | Re: RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) [snipped way-cool graph] Very interesting. I hadn't thought of "draining" in terms of number of messages, I was thinking in terms of signal-to-noise. Which is a bit harder to graph. But the anecdotal evidence seems to suggest LUGNET is having (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | (...) Yeah, number-of-messages seemed like the easiest to graph. I'm also getting data on number of messages containing "auction|sale", "mindstorms", or "star wars", with that sort of in mind. Signal is hard to describe simply. (...) Hmmm, (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!) —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | [ (X)FUT lugnet.off-topic.geek and lugnet.admin.general ] Steve: [...] (...) Few or many messages per thread? - few messages per thread could mean - quick correct answers - nobody cares to discuss anything - many messages per thread could mean - (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RTL posting stats (was Re: Lugnet Newsgroups Anniversary!) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Good points. It can be argued that massive flame-war threads *are* indicative of the level of community. If only because people care enough to get into long-winded pointless debates. (...) Not sure about this, except to look for posts with (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
