Subject:
|
Re: polybags perforated vs solid
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Sep 1999 02:58:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
645 times
|
| |
|
|
We've opened 20+ copies of the same sets, and we get any mix of the three bags:
1) Perforated, so the kiddies can't choke
2) Unperforated with the big CHOKING HAZARD label, so the parents can't sue
3) Unperforated with no warning, I assume so TLG lawyers can stay in business
defending against these parents when they sue.
I remember as a child that my parents were pleased with the perforated Lego
sacks. I don't know why they still use the others, unless they are cheaper...
Naji
In lugnet.general, Simon Robinson writes:
> I've often pondered about whether there's some rule
> about when Lego uses perforated polybags and when they
> use the more solid-looking, unperforated, ones.
>
> I've finally concluded there is no pattern (apart possibly from
> the solid bags tending to turn up in more recent sets).
>
> The reason? I finally got round to opening my 4532 level
> crossings. They are all packed identically. Except that one of
> them has perforated polybags and the others have the
> non-perforated bags. So I guess they really are interchangeable.
>
> Simon
> http://www.SimonRobinson.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | polybags perforated vs solid
|
| I've often pondered about whether there's some rule about when Lego uses perforated polybags and when they use the more solid-looking, unperforated, ones. I've finally concluded there is no pattern (apart possibly from the solid bags tending to turn (...) (25 years ago, 4-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
