 | | Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —John Neal
|
| | | If you were gratis, you'd be scot-free;-) (follow-up to .fun) (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | OK, I don't get it! :) Enlighten me, John! Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —John Neal
|
| | | | Maybe that was too idiomatic. Here in the colonies (;) scot-free means free from conditions or obligations; gratis of course means free.... kinda loses what little humor it had in the first place in translation:-( Oh well. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | Or to be unemcumbered by George C. Scott.. (...) When you dissect jokes they die. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | IMPOSTER!! What have you done with the *real* Thomas McSpamcake??? You may be able to fool Lugnet, but not me. Nnnnnnnnnoo. Confess, or face the consequences, counterfeit interlocutor! -John "Sherlock" Neal (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | | (...) No no, it's Legnut. Either nuts about Lego or legs, whichever. (...) I am Interlocutor of Borg.. (...) *The* Sherlock? As in, "No Shir^Ht Sherlock?" :-) -Tom McD. when replying, "angels and ministers of spamcake defend us!" - Spamlet, act I (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) 220, 221, whatever it takes. I used to enjoy a Zagnut every now and then... (...) Resistance is toofewtile (...) That's right; No shir^Ht, no shoes, no service <packs> (...) "By the bricking of my thumbs, something bricked this way comes" - (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —Alex Roode
|
| | | | | | | (...) Gasp! TOM? what's happened? u diddnt ad a spamcake jokE!!! Ahh! u've been abducted by the Insectoids! AHHH...HHH!!! Alex "Give me an idiotic spamcake joke now!!!!!!!" Roode (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | | AND ALEX HAS BEEN CLONED!!! (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | | | | | (...) To quote PeeWee Herman, "I meant to do that". That was a carefully planned ommission to see how many folks would go through withdrawals. Apparently spamcake is more addictive than I previously thought. This lends creedence to my theory that (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —Alex Roode
|
| | | | | | (...) Gasp! TOM? what's happened? u diddnt ad a spamcake jokE!!! Ahh! u've been abducted by the Insectoids! AHHH...HHH!!! Alex "Give me an idiotic spamcake joke now!!!!!!!" Roode (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —John Neal
|
| | | | | | AND ALEX HAS BEEN REPLICATED!!! (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Great Scott! (was Re: What is this all about... —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | OK, I get it! D'oh! Still cute, however! :) Scott Sanburn (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
