 | | Re: Weren't we all expecting this??
|
|
(...) Actually, that is an interesting article about a controversial article. The test that the magazine had done involved scratching off the plastic, heating plastic in a solution of nitric acid (this is a typical way a lab tests for lead in paint (...) (17 years ago, 21-Oct-07, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Weren't we all expecting this??
|
|
(...) I'm not sayin'; I'm just sayin'. Know what I'm sayin'? 0:-) JOHN (17 years ago, 20-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Weren't we all expecting this??
|
|
(...) You mean to say I'm stockpiling lead saturated toys?! ; ) God Bless, Nathan (17 years ago, 20-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Weren't we all expecting this??
|
|
Keep in mind, what the magazine asserted was that there was lead in the yellow maxi block, not that lead could be passed on to a child swallowing it. Hydrochloric acid (stomache) is not sulfuric acid. The magazine went on to recommend the product as (...) (17 years ago, 19-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Weren't we all expecting this??
|
|
(...) Excellent points, Tommy! The need for transparency in a situation like this is great, especially when the burden of proof is upon the party making the accusation. In this case, the magazine must support its claim in a verifiable way. Instead, (...) (17 years ago, 19-Oct-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
