To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 53257
53256  |  53258
Subject: 
Re: TSRR #500 and the Texas State Railroad Project
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.general
Date: 
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:14:30 GMT
Viewed: 
497 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Ben Fleskes wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Anthony Sava wrote:

   Of course credit where it’s due: my #500 uses the awesome BBB wheels, as well as a wheel configuration suggested to me by Ben Fleskes himself. Because Pacific types, and any other 4 wheeled pony truck locos, have a hard time negotiating their pony truck around their own pistons, I’ve split the pony truck in half. The rear wheels of the pony truck are fixed to the locomotive, while the front wheels move independantly. Since there is only one pair of flanged drivers, the locomotive rotates using the fixed pony truck wheels. It’s a great design.

   --Anthony

Nice work. Looks like the suggestion worked well. The idea of combining one axle of a leading truck into the same truck with the driving wheels has a lot of potential for creating big steam engines. Of course, it is only possible with blind drivers. The technique gives a lot of flexibilty that simply wouldn’t exist otherwise.


Thanks! There are a few quirks with the design, but they’re not hard to overcome. With my locomotive, the center of rotation is forward of the center of gravity, so without the rear blind drivers and the load-bearing rear truck, the locomotive would tip backwards. Aside from that I haven’t found any flaws, the design runs points and curves great.

   Credit goes to you for putting your model out there for people to critique and comment on, before it is done. But then again, that’s the great thing with LEGO, I find that very few creations are ever done, they just keep getting better and better with each rebuild. That is one of the things that make LEGO railroading so much better then typical ‘Model’ railroading (like HO gage).

Cheers,

Ben Fleskes Big Ben Bricks LLC

Well, I don’t consider myself as experienced or talented a train builder as I do myself a castle builder, so I’m always ready to listen to advice. I’ve not been building trains for a full year yet.

I still have the reminents of my HO train stuff, and I agree, LEGO railroading is so much better. A standard rail hobbyist builds a building or railcar for his layout and he’s stuck with it. If he doesn’t like something, he’s forced to break/cut/glue/paint it to where he likes it. Us LEGO fans just have to pop in a new piece and we’re done. If a standard rail hobbyist doesn’t like his building altogether, he’s got to throw it away. For us, we just turn it into something else.

Now if I can just get my trains on one of those ‘world’s largest LEGO train layouts’ for five minutes...

Thanks for the reply and all your help!

--Anthony



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: TSRR #500 and the Texas State Railroad Project
 
(...) *cough* Detroit NMRA show *cough* JohnG, GMLTC (18 years ago, 5-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: TSRR #500 and the Texas State Railroad Project
 
(...) Nice work. Looks like the suggestion worked well. The idea of combining one axle of a leading truck into the same truck with the driving wheels has a lot of potential for creating big steam engines. Of course, it is only possible with blind (...) (18 years ago, 5-Jan-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, FTX)

14 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR