Subject:
|
Re: How many pieces in a pound? (estimation...)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:00:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4282 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.general, David Eaton wrote:
> In light of that, I'm currently trying to gather data from BrickLink, which
> happens to have weight information for some pieces! Following this, I'm hoping
> to create a cross-reference with set inventories and see how much specific sets
> weigh in terms of pure brick. Given that less than half of the parts on record
> seem to have weight information, this may not yield good data, but hopefully
> it'll be more accurate than rough guessing.
So, for starters, I checked the weight of my entire collection according to
Peeron:
Total Weight: 446376.280000005 grams
Total Pieces: 367662
Total with weight: 10426
Total without weight: 2541
Total pieces with weight: 339630
Total pieces without weight: 28032
So, of the 12967 different types of elements I own, BrickLink had data for
roughly 10426 of them. Some are inaccurate, like combination parts (minifig
legs, etc), but it should be roughly close.
Of my total 367662 pieces total, it found weights for about 92% of them
(339630). The total weight it found was about 984.091245 pounds, which boils
down to about 345.12 pieces per pound, or 760.86 per kilogram.
So, pending further investigation, it looks like 350/pound should be a good
estimate!
DaveE
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: How many pieces in a pound? (estimation...)
|
| (...) OK Dave, you have me scared now. Accoring to Peeron, I have 335367 parts from sets. Add several hundred pounds of Pick-A-Brick and I seem to be in the half-ton ballpark as well. That number just sounds huge. Or it means I am half way there. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Aug-06, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: How many pieces in a pound? (estimation...)
|
| (...) For the curious, I'm actually in the middle of doing a more precise calculation. After I answered yesterday, I went around and looked for previous LUGNET posts on the matter, and found a staggering number of estimations for less pieces per (...) (18 years ago, 11-Aug-06, to lugnet.general)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|