 | | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) I, for one, would welcome Lego re-releasing the Yellow Castle... I'd like to have a whole classic knight army, with flip-up visors. :) And I would also welcome Lego to re-release classic sets in classic colors if possible... I'm still not (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Color Chart (the portable kind) available
|
|
(...) Thanks (...) Done (...) Wow; don't know what's going on there. Went to my member profile to fix that, and saw that it's CORRECT there <dulcaoin@alumni.cse...pam#.edu>, while even this response continues to present the wrong one. I'm not sure (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) snipped (...) YES, yes they are! Which is how all of this sort of got started. (...) In the past I was only getting intermittent feedback on MOCs I have posted, by ppl that stated they were lurkers. But now... Like you, I am also getting more (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) Oops Eric, I guess sometimes I am not as clear as I should be... I meant, that people asked me those questions after my first post in this thread, and I just wanted to respond publicly, I certainly wasnt questioning the motives of any other (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
Dave, Great post! There are possibilities for Ambassador "insider trading" in Lego, that is true. But with the huge volume of parts that are generated by TLG, I don't have much worry about someone hoarding all the parts. Even with all hoopla about (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) until Clark Stephens recommended to me that route. There needs to be a major announcement on this problem. I wonder how many others have this same problem. Maybe Lugnet isn't dying off.... just a lot of folks can no longer post, and haven't (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) Could be in some cases, because they are having trouble posting to LUGNET. Email posting confirmations are broken and have been for some time, but the problem is not known to everyone, and nor is the solution (use the web link in the email to (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote: <snip> (...) I took your motivation as asking legitimate questions regarding a legitimate issue. (...) <snip (...) Is it me or are many people 'going underground' where discussions on LUGNET are concerned? (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
(...) I don't think we can say that improved relations *is* the price we pay for the NDA and the Ambassador programs. I think it's more accurate to say that it's the *hope* and *desire* of most people, from AFOL's to the people at TLC, that the (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Questions about fan involvement with TLC
|
|
In lugnet.general, C. L. GunningCook wrote: <snip> (...) Well my motivation was that I am under NDA and thought that perspective needed to be heard (even if my NDA prevents me from saying very much specific). (...) Ultimately the price will be (...) (18 years ago, 15-Apr-06, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
