| |
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, Selçuk Göre writes:
> > > [...] You already mentioned some "special" provisions to allow older
> > > users to continue their well known nicks, that are not related to their
> > > names,
> >
> > No, that wasn't to give special treatment to anyone to use nicks • unrelated
> > to their names, it was citing examples of gray-area cases.
>
> OK, I see the confusion now... Sorry for being ambiguous. When I wrote:
>
> "Anyway, here are some examples that do seem gray to me and may need
> careful attention...(these have all been disclosed publicly on LUGNET
> by their owners)"
>
> in:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=2082
>
> I meant carefully and tactfully deciding whether or not those ID's would be
> OK, and if necessary, gently and diplomatically explaining why they • weren't.
> I didn't mean to imply that they were OK, a priori or otherwise, and
> certainly not because someone was an older user. I just meant that they
> were potentially sensitive cases.
>
> --Todd
I've already get it. But the confusing phrase was not this one, it was:
"Those are all fun names, of course, and these people could all *certainly*
continue to use these "handles" as they currently do in the newsgroups --
we're not talking here about changing anything anything -- just about how to
move forward."
:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
