To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 5230
5229  |  5231
Subject: 
Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 5 Jul 1999 12:32:06 GMT
Viewed: 
89 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
In lugnet.admin.general, Selçuk Göre writes:
[...] You already mentioned some "special" provisions to allow older
users to continue their well known nicks, that are not related to their
names,

No, that wasn't to give special treatment to anyone to use nicks unrelated
to their names, it was citing examples of gray-area cases.

OK, I see the confusion now...  Sorry for being ambiguous.  When I wrote:

   "Anyway, here are some examples that do seem gray to me and may need
   careful attention...(these have all been disclosed publicly on LUGNET
   by their owners)"

in:

   http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=2082

I meant carefully and tactfully deciding whether or not those ID's would be
OK, and if necessary, gently and diplomatically explaining why they weren't.
I didn't mean to imply that they were OK, a priori or otherwise, and
certainly not because someone was an older user.  I just meant that they
were potentially sensitive cases.

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
 
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) unrelated (...) weren't. (...) I've already get it. But the confusing phrase was not this one, it was: "Those are all fun names, of course, and these people could all *certainly* continue to use these (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
 
(...) Wow. Well, at least if someone uses "ats2", it'd have to be logically formed from their name, so it would be clear that they weren't just doing it to be rude/offensive. (...) They're not a problem at all from an internal coding standpoint, but (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR