To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 5210
5209  |  5211
Subject: 
Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general
Date: 
Sun, 4 Jul 1999 22:55:31 GMT
Viewed: 
222 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, "Greg Majewski" <citrusx__@yahoo.com> writes:
> > If you look at this situation from how it exists already, you will find that
> 
> Oh, believe me, I *have* looked at it...!  :-)  Been seriously looking at
> this on and off for years...
> 
> 
> > 99% of the internet's Lego community are civilized adults, the rest being
> > civilized teenagers or whatever, so you don't really have to worry about "gray
> > areas," at least not how I look at it. Sure, some people out there may be loud
> > and annoying, but they aren't offensive or vulgar.
> 
> The gray areas I'm thinking of aren't so much the offensive or vulgar things
> (although I'm sure there are some things which are both offensive and gray,
> i.e. mildly offensive), but more so the non-offensive childish and cutesy
> things, which set a tone inconsistent with the more serious and adult nature
> of things here.  Some examples again of cutesy screen names:
> 
>   acidburn, phyrefox, defcon5, neozero, immortal, genepool, pubert, etc.
> 
> Now those certainly aren't "gray" to me -- they're way out there in la-la
> land in my book, as they have absolutely nothing to do with anyone's real
> name.  (Barf.)  But starting from there and going more toward nicknames,
> let's look at some actual gray examples:
> 
> We covered "moz" and "cogs" earlier, so forget those; I don't really think
> those are too gray (anyone?) and would be perfectly happy seeing those
> assigned to Chris Moseley and Aaron Coghill, for example.  And except for
> the letter change (s to z), Moz is just like Woz (Steve Wozniak's famous
> nickname) as Moz is based quite directly on Chris Moseley's name.
> 
> Anyway, here are some examples that do seem gray to me and may need careful
> attention...(these have all been disclosed publicly on LUGNET by their
> owners):
> 
>              "R2" <=> Rose Regner
>           "Ickna" <=> Nick Holdbrooks
>           "Misha" <=> Mike Stanley
>           "Binky" <=> Neil Ford
>          "topher" <=> Chris Adler
>          "Mookie" <=> Tamy Teed
>          "Zonker" <=> David K. Z. Harris
>          "Beaker" <=> James Baker
>         "Adamski" <=> Adam McDonagh
>        "dulcaoin" <=> Joshua Delahunty
>        "Ed Boxer" <=> Ed Jones
>   "Weird Richard" <=> Richard Mussler-Wright
> 
> Some of these are naturally more gray than others.  Take Mike's case, for
> example.  He could probably give some good proof that his nickname is based
> on his real name, and that it makes sense, and isn't childish, and isn't a
> "handle" or a "screen name."  If it's what people actually call him in
> spoken real-life, and if, for him, it's an actual 'nother name, then that's
> probably not too gray after all, compared to some of the others.  Joshua's
> handle is very interesting too, but he can talk about it if he wants.  Some
> of the others?-- well, for all we know, David Harris's second middle name
> might actually be Zonker.  And "Beaker" is an obvious bastardization of
> Baker, and "topher" is an obvious bastardization of Christopher.  Whether
> any of the above would/could/should "pass" is open to debate.
> 
> Tamy's case is a particularly gray one...unless her middle name or something
> like that starts with an M, or there is some other deep meaning in the name.
> For example, I once worked with a guy named John Muchow.  He's one of the
> friendliest guys in the world, and has a great sense of humor, so he didn't
> mind us making up an endearing nickname for him (which he also happened to
> like and take as his own over time).  The history of it:  His last name is
> pronounced MUHK-ow, but when he first started on the job, we didn't know
> that; so we all assumed it was MOO-kow.  That quickly somehow mutated into
> "Mookie" and stuck for years.  The funny thing is, in high school no one
> ever called him Mookie because everyone already knew how to pronounce his
> name, so it never led down that path.
> 
> Anyway, so that's an example of a nickname that derives from someone's real
> name.  We'd have to know more about Tamy's history to know whether her
> "Mookie" handle derives from her real name or from something else.  So that
> makes that one a fairly gray area.  That's another problem with nicknames of
> that particular type, BTW -- they're always likely to be in use by several
> different people simultaneously, sometimes even the opposite biological
> gender.
> 
> Now here are some other examples -- things that _don't_ seem gray to me --
> in terms of member-ID's and in the scheme describe in the previous post,
> they all clearly fall on the "fail" side of things in my mind... (all of
> these associations have also been disclosed publicly on LUGNET by their
> owners):
> 
>   "Rufus T. Falkenstein" <=> Dietmar Stüver
>     "Perhaps a Princess" <=> Sarah Heacock
>       "Full Metal Monty" <=> Greg Cont
>          "Lord Insanity" <=> Mike Petrucelli
>           "Mirror Spock" <=> Kai-Arne Reiter
>           "OptimusPrime" <=> Alex Sack
>            "Mike Fusion" <=> Michael Nickasch
>            "Green Alien" <=> Jorge Fernandez
>             "GitD_Ghost" <=> Frank Athens
>             "GearMonkey" <=> Robert Eddings
>             "hansolo843" <=> Danny Lynam
>             "legomenace" <=> Charles Spindell
>             "TooMuchDew" <=> William Toenjes
>             "The Undead" <=> Scott Javoroski
>              "NumberSix" <=> Colin Bell
>              "Kirk Unit" <=> Kirk Houser
>              "Carbon 60" <=> Simon Denscombe
>              "citrusx__" <=> Greg Majewski

Oh! Oh! I can explain this one! My last name is pronounced muh-JEH-skee, but
people always say muh-JOOS-kee, which led to the nickname Juice for me. Also,
my favorite color is orange which led some people to call me Orange Juice,
which let to Citrus somehow. When I registered in Yahoo!, the name Citrus was
already taken, so I have been using CitrusX for about three years, and that's
what the internet's non-Lego community has called me... Oh well, this may be
irrelivant (sp?) because I am planning on using my RTL alias of Mmaje if I
join. I do hope that everyone can see where I got that one..
Greg
citrusx__@yahoo.com
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Dome/1888/

>               "RoninSFX" <=> Peter Abrahamson
>               "Nephilim" <=> Jeff Thompson
>               "Dengar98" <=> Pearson Castner
>                "Lorbaat" <=> Eric Joslin
>                "HTMLPro" <=> Chris Alas
>                "Gemlord" <=> Chris Thompson
>                 "MadMax" <=> Mark Rideout
>                 "Baylit" <=> Jon Kozan
>                 "Izzy98" <=> Israel Alanis
>                  "ExitG" <=> Carrie Whitcher
>                  "Codex" <=> Kevin Calman
>                  "tanis" <=> Michael Cortez
>                  "quozl" <=> Jonathan Nichol
>                   "Eggy" <=> Tyler Harms
>                   "Onyx" <=> Jeff Boen
>                   "Wydd" <=> Dan Solum
>                   "Vega" <=> Selvi Francesco
>                    "Ice" <=> Mark Koeberl
>                    "TFM" <=> Dean Husby
> 
> Those are all fun names, of course, and these people could all *certainly*
> continue to use these "handles" as they currently do in the newsgroups --
> we're not talking here about changing anything anything -- just about how to
> move forward.
> 
> To create member-ID's with pure "handles" or "screen names" like that is to
> start down the AOL path (see previous post).  So this last group wouldn't
> pass (not that it necessarily should -- handles are *far* more capricious
> than real-life names).
> 
> If it turns out that people are going to be *really* upset that they can't
> necessarily use their traditional favorite "handle" or "screen name" or
> alias as their LUGNET member-ID, then using purely numbers as member-ID's is
> probably the best all-around approach, since there's no way for anyone to
> get upset at those (is there?).  On the other hand, if a few people do get
> really upset with the scheme outlined above, then that's probably OK if 98%
> or 99% of everyone else is OK with it.
> 
> The whole thing is a compromise, after all.
> 
> BTW, sometimes people have last names that appear on the surface to be
> made-up, but are actually their real-life name.  Consider Tané Tachyon of
> Tachyon Labs, for example...  A "tachyon" particle is something made-up for
> Star Trek, but Tachyon actually her real last name.  Isn't that cool?  :-)
> 
> --Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
 
(...) Hey, that's a pretty great story! It's always fun to hear how nicknames come about. (...) Well, keep in mind, the goal here is to discourage (in a mechanical way) general "aliases" or "handles" or "screen names." You probably wouldn't be able (...) (27 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: member id's: simple numbers or something more?
 
(...) Oh, believe me, I *have* looked at it...! :-) Been seriously looking at this on and off for years... (...) The gray areas I'm thinking of aren't so much the offensive or vulgar things (although I'm sure there are some things which are both (...) (27 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

112 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR