Subject:
|
Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 21:32:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1957 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Greg Hyland wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Anthony Sava wrote:
| |
First, Megabloks already has (or had) the Batman license...
|
Actaully, it was Art Asylum and Play Along Toys that had the Batman licence
with thier C3 and Mini-Mates line. Appauling construction sets, but cool
figures.
|
Wow. My opinion is 180° from yours. I hate the Mini-Mates figures from head to
toe, but I was generally satisfied with the design of the sets (though they
weren’t a good dollar value, which is part of why they tanked, IMO).
| |
| |
Megabloks now has a Spiderman license, complete with Doc Ock and I think the
Green Goblin... did LEGO lose that license?
|
The MegaBloks stuff looks like it’s all based on comic designs, not the
movies. Even their Fantastic Four stuff is comic based, not movie based.
|
That’s incorrect, I’m afraid. The box for the very nice Baxter Building Lab set
features graphics from the film as well as the 20th Century Fox logo.
Perhaps the license deal extends to that film company, but not to Sony?
| |
LEGO Spider-Man is for the two movies. But will they do more sets when the
third movie comes out?>
|
That, I don’t know. Mega Bloks has already revealed some of its product line
for 2006, including sets with the Green Goblin (better than LEGO’s version),
Veom, and Carnage, but these are comic-based rather than film-based.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Na na na na na na na na...
|
| (...) Actaully, it was Art Asylum and Play Along Toys that had the Batman licence with thier C3 and Mini-Mates line. Appauling construction sets, but cool figures. They obviously don't have the licence any more! (...) The MegaBloks stuff looks like (...) (19 years ago, 25-Oct-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
