|
|
 | | LEGOFan.org frustrates me
|
| LEGOFan.org frustrates me for three reasons. 1. LEGOFan.org is supposed to be the place were people from LEGO answer our questions about LDD (I'd even accept "Sorry, but I can't comment on that right now), but people from LEGO aren't answering or (...) (19 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
| (...) Excellent question. We did get 2 rounds of answers but they weren't very "meaty". (...) I think as the article said, LEGO are constrained as to what they can say officially/publicly. But unofficially we're getting lots of winks, nods, thumbs (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Re: LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
| (...) Why isn't TLG giving this sort of feedback though the (URL) forum> it set up specifically for that? LEGO Factory has been out for three weeks, and the TLG reps have yet to provide any answers (other than "LDD will be improved in the future"). (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | LDD "hackers" made CNET
|
| (URL) For those of you following the efforts of LDD users in streamlining the bag use in LDD, CNET published a cool article about it, and LEGO's reaction to their work. Quoted are Dan Malec, Larry Pieniazek, and Jake McKee (among others). I find it (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad, lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
| | | | | Escher preview (Re: Gold (Re: My collection of colours))
|
| (...) Yeah, it's a pain in the neck to photograph--especially the leftmost pillar. But here's another shot, I think it's the best I'll get: (URL) here's a larger size image: (URL) background on this project, I'm building a series of Escher models (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build)
|
|
