 | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| (...) Fair enough, Richie's post was perhaps a little bit long-winded, but I really don't see anything there that could be described as "(*(^&$$*&^%^(*)_*, )(& )*)(&^&*^&$". Yes, I suppose it could even be called negative, but only in that he raised (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| I know I know, please pardon my outburst. e (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| |
