 | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| (...) Richie: Nice contest entry but I don't think it will win. Everyone else: Don't feed the troll. (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX) !
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| (...) Agreed. 'Nuff said. And now back to building... -- Nathan Wells (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| (...) Noted. pardon my own negativity, I'm trying to build something cool to share, to at least offer something positive. e There is such a thing as, build to mouth ratio, as there is to lurk and build ratio. Everyone try to help keep this place (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| (...) Which is, if I recall correctly, a turn of phrase meaning "your model is weakly executed,and not very funny". What model? Are you referring to Janey's tattoo as being weakly executed and not very funny? Cheers Richie Dulin (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough
|
| Richie, please stop. e (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| |
