 | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
| | | | WTH! Richie, get the heck out of here. YOUR bad press for the community at large with your constant (*(^&$$*&^%^(*)_*, )(& )*)(&^&*^&$ and I'll show you some bad press for the community at large with some _)*)(&^(&%$&%# of my own! Go beeeyotch about (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Kevin Blocksidge
| | | | | | (...) Gasp! I agree with Eric, what has the world come to?!?!? Richie, it's gotten old. No one cares anymore, if indeed any did to begin with. Give it up. ~Kevoh (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general) !
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Allister McLaren
| | | | | | (...) Fair enough, Richie's post was perhaps a little bit long-winded, but I really don't see anything there that could be described as "(*(^&$$*&^%^(*)_*, )(& )*)(&^&*^&$". Yes, I suppose it could even be called negative, but only in that he raised (...) (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
| | | | | | | I know I know, please pardon my outburst. e (19 years ago, 6-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Okay, maybe not a real MOC, but close enough —Eric Sophie
| | | | | (...) Richie, I am very sorry I blew up on you. I didn't realize you were goofing around. Again, I apologize. Your post just really rubbed me the wrong way. At that point I really had it up to (there) with the antics of jlugs. Silly silly me. (...) (19 years ago, 22-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
