 | | Re: Bricklink frustration —Joe Strout
|
| | | This is a pretty interesting idea. Here's a variation that might be slightly more likely to happen: A group of sellers could get together and form a company to sell new/used LEGO parts over the internet, in a network like you describe. Their online (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bricklink frustration —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | (...) and that is the understatement of the century. Transport costs are already a goodly portion of the gross order billing. One year I calculated that 28% of remittances were for shipping/transport. Parts (unless the part is rare/desirable/low (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bricklink frustration —Steve Lane
|
| | | | (...) Since I posted I've been thinking about that. I doubt he'd let two rules slide, but If I could bump up the order to $10 he might consider shipping to England. At least we speak the same language. I've been scouring his inventory for the type (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
