Subject:
|
Re: First Ever Juniorized Lego Part?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:28:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1145 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Shifflett wrote:
> Oh yes you do need the larger bricks and plates.
> You could never get good structural integrity out of only small
> plates or bricks.
> I have built many of the 'sculpture' sets Lego offers
> and they need the larger plates to hold the smaller ones
> firmly in place.
>
> dave
So, I guess you would say that a brick like "Plate 2x2 corner"
http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/2420
is not juniorized, as even if it could be made out of 1x1 and 2x1 plates it
would not keep the structural strenght
whereas its bigger and older counterpart "4x4 L brick"
http://guide.lugnet.com/set/217_2
is juniorized, as this can be made out of other bricks without losing the
structural strenght?
Arne, Copenhagen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: First Ever Juniorized Lego Part?
|
| (...) I guess I don't really know what juniorized means. If it means creating a single part that could be made by combining other current parts, Then yes both of the parts you mentioned would be considered juniorized (assuming the component parts (...) (19 years ago, 13-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: First Ever Juniorized Lego Part?
|
| (...) I agree with Anders, what parts were you thinking about that were 'juniorized' to make this part. (...) Slight problem here Anders, the 4x4 with rounded corner didn't exist until 40 years after the Wing 4x8 Wow 40 years, that's a really long (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
