 | | Re: memberships —Jeff Johnston
| | | | (...) This would arguably be more valuable, since it means you could easily save out the parts you buy the set(s) for. Heck, I'd be happy if it were just a brick auction place that I could run an auction at. But then again, I think anything I ran (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: memberships —Steve Bliss
| | | | | | (...) It would also be arguably less valuable, becuase you'd have to go through all the work of establishing the inventory, and keying it in. But requiring the auctioneer to supply the inventory also makes the whole idea more practical, because the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: memberships —Mike Stanley
| | | | | (...) Hrmmm... maybe I dreamed this, but at one time I thought it would work like this: You tell it you have 8 copies of 6097. It spits out an inventory of those sets. You mark the parts you _don't_ want (say the cauldrons and horse barding). The (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: memberships —Jeff Stembel
| | | | | (...) multiple (...) As long as I can set the lot sizes myself if I don't like what it comes up with, I'll be happy, too. Also, I hope there is a database of LDraw part images we can access and add to, if need be. Jeff P.S. I'd try it out too, if it (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | | |
