 | | Re: Brickshelf going away???
|
|
(...) I'm trying to not go into a total panic on this. Even if we can shift everything over to Maj.com, it would be a huge hit to the community. For one, not everyone will shift everything over, either because they don't reallize that the site is (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf going away???
|
|
(...) Raised some good points. I had similar thoughts/feelings on reading the news. This is big, and it's bad. Don't forget we've already lost MOCPages (at least for the moment; I've crossed my fingers) So losing BS would be like losing a fat chunk (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf going away???
|
|
(...) That is not necessarily true; brickshelf.com could run a simple CGI that redirects any queries to the corresponding location on maj.com. Since they seem to be running the same software and have the same URL structure, it would be pretty (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf going away? Or: Can we take action to prevent?
|
|
(...) Eeesh, let us hope that this is not the case. Let this only be a duck and cover drill... Lugnet, Brickshelf, MOC pages are the three points of conjunction for all LEGO interests. This would be really bad, as in a death blow to the greater (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf going away???
|
|
In lugnet.general, Joe Strout wrote: snip 8< snip 8< (...) $60/year? I Never pay that much for a domain! I can't believe people still do! Here's where I shop: (URL) There may be better deals out there. If you're looking for a deal on hosting, try (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC Pages is OK, just down temporarily
|
|
(...) Jake said that MOC Pages is OK (URL) (see here)>; it's just that Sean Kenney is away on his honeymoon, so he can't fix the glitch that's got the site down. (19 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf going away???
|
|
(...) maj.com probably gets more ad revenue since its audience is wider and the ads are more varied. I'm not sure why that couldn't subsidize BS though... --Bram (19 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
