 | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —James Trobaugh
|
| | | (...) That's Ambassador Trobaugh to you mister! :) jt (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Power Corrupts! Didn't take long, did it, JT! you don't see ME going around insisting people use my many titles, do you? Didn't think so. Help, I'm being oppressed! ++Lar (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | "Larry Pieniazek" <larry.(mylastname)@...e.DOT.com> wrote in message news:IDGyDp.oH5@lugnet.com... (...) Um, you're professional titles or the ones we use here....err, the ones we can't use here in fear of breaking the ToU? :-P --Rob (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "The LEGO Group" or "The LEGO Company"? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Bloody peasant. That would be "repressed". Sorry to get all pendantic (sic) on your butt, but that's one of my favs. Incidently, my daughter was lucky enough to be in NYC last weekend and see "Spamelot" with Hank Azaria et al. I would take (...) (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| | | | |
