 | | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) I don't know why I bother to read these sessions. I am usually left feeling worse about TLC than I would have had I not bothered. One exchange, in particular bugged me this time: [architect] ok, next to Jojo then [Jojo] Who is in charge for (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Another "unofficial" response: I think we can all make the general inference that the sets were at once ordered and structured. Lego itself is too disorganized, it doesn't know its right hand from its left, therefore, you have a disorganized (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) On the flip side, I was very excited to see the 'outreach' that these types of sessions offer--how many companies do you know that allow a 'one-on-one' with a representative, free of charge? Especially one that we have a personal vested (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Not to make a bigger issue of this comment than was meant, but I am going to step in here quickly. Please remember that I'm but one person. I do my level-headed best to get and distribute as much information about "everything LEGO" as I (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) snip (...) Submitting questions in advance would be fine with me - I'd rather have the best information than the quickest information. Perhaps a monthly poll could be held to determine the questions most in need of answering. I'd like to see a (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote: snip (...) This is definitely a problem with chats. more snipping (...) I do not think that pre-submitted questions would alter discussions of chat questions very much. Some people will be happy with answers you (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Agree. Save the spontaneous discussion for one on one bull sessions where no one is scribing so your words can't get twisted around... (1) This moves you more in the direction of a PR flack, which is not much fun, so do the scripted questions (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Hi Jake! I believe a chat has a strong appeal due to it's interactive nature, and people like to be able to have a conversation with somebody in a position like yours. However, while reading the posts in this thread and reflecting on the chat, (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) Hi, I really like this idea, it's very similar to what I was thinking. Perhaps something like 2 weeks to submit questions, a few days for an admin to edit and mash together similar questions, and then 2 weeks to vote on your favorites. Then, (...) (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Jake Chat II - Transcript
|
|
(...) This has actually been happening on FBTB.net (Ask LEGO Forum) for several years. And yes, the questions have dwindled over time. Jake --- Jake McKee Community Liaison LEGO Community Development (20 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
