| |
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
<snip>
> I'd rather see a prioritised list of parts that need to be made in the old
> colors developed than debate, yet again, why changing the colors was a Bad Idea.
Then why debate? You have continued this conversation far longer than it needs
to be. Maybe one response if you really feel the urge, but honestly, I felt his
claim that Lego owes him money so absurd that it really didn't merit further
debate, and here I am reading your _second_ reply and you are against debating!
Truely, you are only giving his arguement more weight because readers of your
posts have to think about it one more time.
> If I had more time I'd write this a bit softer, I guess, but I don't.
I wonder where you get any time to write all the volumes you have written here
and in other lists. Seriously.
-Alfred
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Color Change - Final Update - Track
|
| (...) It's more than just *my* point of view, it's the law, at least in the US. There is typically no implied warranty of suitability to purpose or fitness that is attached to any good sold here. You would need an express warranty to have any (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
260 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
