 | | Re: Who can make the top 100 posters of 2003?
|
|
(...) Just dug this up: (URL) This was posted in a chatroom a few months ago when someone else asked the same question on LUGNET, but it looks like Jen or Dan never bothered to post it here. (URL) [ j o n ] (URL) zemi.net> (URL) moonbase> (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Who can make the top 100 posters of 2003?
|
|
(...) I guess I'm back in the game at #4. I had been trending down for the last three years... -Tim (21 years ago, 10-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Who can make the top 100 posters of 2003?
|
|
(...) Thanks for sharing that, Jon. One line caught my eye... "Travis Kunce: 491" Sigh. (21 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Who can make the top 100 posters of 2003?
|
|
(...) Sigh. (21 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Who can make the top 100 posters of 2003?
|
|
(...) Wow, I'm #11 - who would have thunk it? the top 50 reads like a Who's Who of .space (space!) -a moment of silence for Travis (451)- -Lenny (21 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Who can make the top 100 posters of 2003?
|
|
"Lenny Hoffman" <lahoffma@*NOSPAM*ma...r.fsu.edu> wrote in message news:Hw2KJq.B9q@lugnet.com... (...) is it (...) I (...) know (...) the (...) post (...) Hmm, what happened to it? Frank (21 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.general)
|
