 | | Re: * 1999 *
|
| (...) WINGS (...) Hehe... but IF it is SPACE SHUTTLE then it will landing like a plain. You know - Discovery, Atlantis, Columbia... and all this NASA Space Shuttles. ;)) And LEGO did just some Space Shuttles. Like this wonderful Technic model. Or (...) (26 years ago, 2-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: * 1999 *
|
| (...) And even with the larger wing size on the real shuttles (compared to the new lego one) they are hard to land. Also, some of the new shuttle concepts, which do not use boosters for take off, have yet even smaller wings. the import factors in (...) (26 years ago, 2-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: * 1999 *
|
| (...) Well, I guess in certain emergency situations it might need to land ON a plain, but I'm not sure how it would land like a plain. :) (26 years ago, 2-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: * 1999 *
|
| <snip> Or this (...) You must be the first one to use this expression.. Eric (26 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: * 1999 *
|
| Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote (...) Actually, I think that that is a more accurate description of the flying characteristics of the real shuttle than the alternative spelling suggests. The one I heard was "like a brick, but less (...) (26 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
| |
