To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 45761
45760  |  45762
Subject: 
Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org, lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:05:04 GMT
Viewed: 
74 times
  
Kelly McKiernan wrote:

The courts of the US have repeatedly upheld the
distinction of infrastructure vs. content.

Have I rejected that distinction anywhere?

[...] that the person who creates the content has both
rights and responsibilities for that content.

Yes.  Have I ever claimed anything else?

From the messages I've seen here, the person who would
provide content (e.g. non-code) to LFN is essentially
giving away their copyright on their work.

Wrong.  They would have to give LFN a license to distribute
their work, just as you have given Lugnet a license to
distribute your work, when you signed up to get posting
rights to Lugnet.

I can't speak for anyone else about this, but as a writer
I'd be reluctant to give up my copyright on anything I
create.

So am I.

(Granting an open source license to content isn't
precisely "giving it up" but it's the next thing to it,
from a copyright standpoint.)

It is a _little_ bit similar (how similar depends on the
exact license).  But you have given up as many rights to
your writings by agreeing to the rules for Lugnet, as you
would with the most _extreme_ Open Source license, so I
honestly can't understand your problem.

I'm kind of surprised LEGO would make exceptions from
their "Fair Use" policy to allow their content to be
distributed under an Open Source licensing agreement,

LEGO hasn't agreed to that yet.

Play well,

Jacob
--
LEGO Purists' Fighter (building instructions):
  http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Transport/Fly/Purists_fighter/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) Not that I've seen. However, this comment was in reply to your asking why content was different than code, which I hadn't seen addressed elsewhere. (...) Actually, the Lugnet T&Cs reserve Lugnet's right to redistribute all content posted, (...) (21 years ago, 24-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LEGOFan.net - central community run hub for all areas of the LEGO community.
 
(...) The courts of the US have repeatedly upheld the distinction of infrastructure vs. content. For example, spammers using an ISP to send millions of non-solicited emails are liable for their actions, while the ISP is not (unless the ISP knowingly (...) (21 years ago, 22-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)

208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR