|
Tim Courtney <tim.courtney@SPAMCAKE.zacktron.com> wrote:
> For branding purposes, I think this is a bad idea for LUGNET. Someone
> could then advertise their site as "blah.lugnet.com," and have it
> interpreted as an actual part of LUGNET. With this content outside of
> LUGNET's control, the name could be abused.
Also, on a practical level, doing redirects (not just DNS records) as
subdomains would be prohibitively expensive with the current Lugnet
hosting arrangement.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
144 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|