 | | Digitally Signed Email —Neb Okla
|
| | | This is just the kind of email spoofing that makes digital signatures a good idea. Nowadays about 95% of email clients across a variety of OS's support S/MIME digital signatures. Verisign sells them for a yearly fee - but there are at least two (...) (21 years ago, 18-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Digitally Signed Email —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) Or simply SPF. (URL) No encryption needed, and it happens automagically behind the scenes. (...) Or, GPG signatures are *entirely* free. Any decent mail client should support that. (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Digitally Signed Email —Neb Okla
|
| | | | FUT: lugnet.off-topic.debate "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrnc385ha.8ka.....bu.edu... (...) good (...) It's a little silly to say "Simply have all users convince their ISP to change their email infrastructure". I'll (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
