 | | Re: Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | (...) Not really, not for me at least. It seems like there are a few different versions of what this site is going to be running around out there - and it seems that each version is based on what the persom being told wants to hear. I am sorry, (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | [ XFUT lugnet.org ] (...) What did you expect with nine people in the current working group and not much carved in stone yet? (...) That's not good. I would at least have hoped that each of us were consistent in our replies, even if the group as a (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | (...) that order in a domain name is not on its face a trademark violation or misuse nor something the Lego company has control over. (Some big-money decisions in the other direction notwithstanding.) The only reason people should avoid l-e-g-o (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
