 | | Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Dan Boger
|
| | | (...) We already discussed most of this with Jake, and agreed we would have to have no strings attached. The LEGO company would be a welcome visitor and participant in the site, but they will NOT run it, or dictate how the site should be run. I (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.general) !!
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | (...) Not really, not for me at least. It seems like there are a few different versions of what this site is going to be running around out there - and it seems that each version is based on what the persom being told wants to hear. I am sorry, (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Jacob Sparre Andersen
|
| | | | | | | [ XFUT lugnet.org ] (...) What did you expect with nine people in the current working group and not much carved in stone yet? (...) That's not good. I would at least have hoped that each of us were consistent in our replies, even if the group as a (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) that order in a domain name is not on its face a trademark violation or misuse nor something the Lego company has control over. (Some big-money decisions in the other direction notwithstanding.) The only reason people should avoid l-e-g-o (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Community run (was Re: LEGOFan.net...) —Benjamin Ellermann
|
| | | | (...) This is not completely true. Classic Castle is run by a group of administrators (each with an equal vote) not by one individual. Yes, we have a webmaster. If he left, another admin could step into that position. Our funding is by one (...) (21 years ago, 16-Feb-04, to lugnet.general) !
|
| | | | |
