 | | 1 Question: assurances & limitations [Re: LEGOFan.net - central community... ]
|
|
(...) Jake can you clarify this? I expect ‘support’ and use of the word “lego” in the url has been given subject to assurances or limitations with regard the content of the site. If possible, I’d be interested to know what those assurances or (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations [Re: LEGOFan.net - central community... ]
|
|
(...) Actually not. What we _have_ discussed is to make it possible for parents to decide that some classes of content is unsuitable for their children, and for users of the site to decide some age limits for access to content/discussion groups they (...) (21 years ago, 15-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations [Re: LEGOFan.net - central community... ]
|
|
(...) one of the points made by Brad Justus in the original WorldLUG discussion was that kid-oriented information is mired in a morass of legal difficulties particularly in Europe. There are laws about what you can show them, what you can ask them, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations [Re: LEGOFan.net - central community... ]
|
|
(...) To my understanding the laws that has to be obeyed are the ones in which the server stands. (21 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 Question: assurances & limitations
|
|
(...) I have a somewhat different view of things. I would rather block access to my server from the USA than having to be responsible for its content according to laws in the USA. (...) Only sensible rules. And they are basically the same for (...) (21 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.org, lugnet.lego)
|
