 | | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
| (...) Out of curiosity, does anyone suppose that TLG's decision to move toward flesh tones might have been, at least in part, motivated by the fact that successful competitor brands have been marketing flesh-toned figures for years? This, coupled (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
| (...) Well, I would assume this-- what else would motivate change? "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" (and, of course, it's cheaper to do nothing), and perhaps the concept of all yellow figs isn't necessarily "broke", but perhaps profits are. Perhaps (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
| (...) Oops--my cynicism is showing, alas. All too often, it seems, corporations like to pretend that their biggest changes are entirely driven by internal decisions made in a vacuum; they seldom if ever acknowledge that a competitor's practices are (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| | | | | Re: New Skin Tones coming? (was: Re: Scans from new danish 2004 catalog)
|
| (...) Even the hardcore Star Wars LEGO fans are undecided about the Lando fig being "realistic" and not yellow. I like like the fact that minifigs are free of race and any move to change that only hurts the brand. LEGO has lost their focus. They can (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
| |
