 | | Interesting question... —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | Now that we are seing more "custom" parts being made (for example the Starwars weapons, the Castle accessories and the Train wheels), it raises an important question... are these "Lego"? For example, if I use them, am I no-longer a purist? Does (...) (21 years ago, 11-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.trains, lugnet.castle, lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Interesting question... —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | | (...) Hello Jonathan, If I may be so bold as to attempt to answer some of your questions... (...) Technically, the custom parts are not Lego so far as they are not made by The Lego Group A purist uses 100% Lego in their MOC's...with no exceptions (...) (21 years ago, 11-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Interesting question... —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | | Hello! (...) No, they are not. Anything that's not coming under the licence of TLC - not produced by TLC, not packed by TLC (if made anywhere else like motors) and not "monogrammed" with the LEGO logo - is not LEGO. Why should it be considered a (...) (21 years ago, 11-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Interesting question... —Joe Meno
|
| | | | | (...) Quick answer, no. (...) By definition, you're not using 'pure ' parts. (this sounds like an argument about origami - a purist uses one square of paper to make what he wants. Anything else is 'unpure.' How do I know? I do origami, and I am (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Interesting question... —Willy Tschager
|
| | | | | (...) I remember a thread about user defined model-folders in mlcad: IMHO there should also be a folder for custom parts and not-yet-certified parts(parts-I-curren...y-author). As long as they are clearly marked I can't see a reason why we shouldn't (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Interesting question... —Miguel Agullo
|
| | | | Hi all, My two cents: This has come up before in several forms. Here are two recent ones. (URL) it comes to building, I'm a purist: not Lego = no way. But when it comes to Ldraw, I do a 180 on that. I can understand why Ldraw.org is currently 100% (...) (21 years ago, 12-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Interesting question... —Niels Karsdorp
|
| | | | (...) Although I am not a 100% lego purist, I see nothing wrong in using a 'background' in Povray. Real builders build their models on non-lego tables, non-lego floors in non-lego houses and probably photograph them in non-lego gardens. The same if (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
