To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 40509
40508  |  40510
Subject: 
Re: Concerning this new train poll
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 08:42:51 GMT
Viewed: 
103 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Harvey Henkelman writes:
Mr. Larry Pieniazek, I don't appreciate you slamming and insulting each and
everything I have to say.

Hi Harvey,

it has been me, who criticised your poll. Larry was only jumping in much later
in the thread and he did not even uttered your name, was NOT speaking about
your poll, but about making up polls in general.

*********
Really, if people are going to make polls (for anything other than trolling,
that is), it would be nice if they did a little asking around to see what a
reasonable set of choices might be *before* they went off and created them,
so as to make the polls useful for something.
*********

Who cares if this poll doesn't include every
possible option,

I do! You made a poll which gives 'wrong' answers. For the moment it tells us
71% build 6-wides
34% 8-wides
7% 10 wide
etc..

But that is quite far from reality, since some quite important answers are
missing. I myself know lots of people who build 2-wide and now I learned that
there are more than just me building 7-wide.

LUGNET is (or was) supposed to be fun! I thought we had
'discussed' this before.

Right, so please calm down. Nobody than me told you your poll was
insufficient (and therefor less fun as it should be).

Now I realize that I'll have to take this issue up
[snip some words, that do not belong into a public forum]

Leg godt (and now back to the bricks!)

Ben
www.fgltc.org



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Concerning this new train poll
 
(...) Who has made the last couple train-related polls? And why would he mention the subject now? (...) E=MC² (...) Seems to me that the numbers speak for themselves (...) There is no particular measure to 'fun', everybody enjoys a different degree (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Concerning this new train poll
 
Mr. Larry Pieniazek, I don't appreciate you slamming and insulting each and everything I have to say. Who cares if this poll doesn't include every possible option, LUGNET is (or was) supposed to be fun! I thought we had 'discussed' this before. Now (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general) ! 

4 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR