 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO? —David Eaton
| | | | (...) One person has admitted to rating several sets a 0, but explained that it was due to his misinterpreting the rating system-- he had thought it was the highest score. IIRC he changed his votes. Others (there are reasons to believe) are just (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO (or 100)? —Ben Roller
| | | | | (...) As long as we're on the topic, I think far too many new sets get 90-100 ratings. I think that many people are just excited about new sets and seem to mark them 90-100 to show approval of new offerings. I wonder how many of these people go back (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
