 | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO? —Dave Johann
| | | | (...) I couldn't agree more, Ken! My addition to that question would be: why do people rate a set they don't own? If you don't own it, then your rating shouldn't count towards the member rating average because you have no idea what you are truly (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO? —Kevin Wilson
| | | | | Dave Johann wrote in message ... (...) People don't necessarily enter the sets they own on LUGNET - I don't - so the two things, marking a set as owned and rating it, are really quite separate. Kevin ---...--- NEW Cottage kit, 577 pieces! (URL) TOWN (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO? —Dave Johann
| | | | | (...) Personally, I wouldn't think of rating a set I don't own/haven't previously owned simply because I don't know how much fun that set was to build, what parts are in that set, overall play value, etc. This is what I thought the ratings system (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Why sets receive a ZERO? —Maggie Cambron
| | | | | (...) My most important criterion is how much I love the set. One of my favorite sets, 4161, the girls' pink oval suitcase, is an example. I love it because it's a girl set and it has colors I love, and it has pink lampposts. And it has sentimental (...) (22 years ago, 17-Nov-02, to lugnet.general)
| | | | | | |
