 | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | (...) thinking of. It had a whopping *TEN* of them in red. Also in red: 4539 Level Crossing My favorite, of course (rare set, only place in grey) is 3313 Lightpoles So, the whole list (so far, that I know of), is... (URL) (10 in red) (URL) (1 in (...) (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Those soccer sets were awesome: very cool models, no overly specialized pieces (except the ball), and many rare/unusual pieces. Steve (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | | | | | (...) Simply MUST agree with you there... 3302: Only decorated 48x48 baseplate that I'm aware of (and such a utilitarian decoration, too) (uniq) 3303: the soccer ball. It may be specialized, but it is awefully cool (and certainly rates "rare") (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) WHAT! Joshua agreeing with Steve!?! (1) How bizarre. An ominous portent, for sure. :-P -- Terry K -- 1. an inside joke. If you only knew........ :-) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) In Junior High we used an educational Lego kit to study growth of cities, it had a 48x48 baseplate which represented the geography of the Seattle area. I think the water was just painted on. Different color bricks were used to represent (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | Yeah, and F(*$*($*($ TLG didn't release them in the US! Sometimes I'd like to walk into Billund with a freshly laundered white glove and slap some people silly (and sometimes I'd like to slap them dead, like when I just saw the post about the SW (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | (...) Uh, don't hold back, Tom. Tell us how you *really* feel... (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | Yeah, well, they ARE braindead idiots. The ONLY logical reason I can think of for cancelling the SW bucket is they realized they didn't have enough production capacity for it AND the SW sets. Gee, maybe they shouldn't have closed Brazil last year? (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | the problem with TLG is that they are trying to lower the mena target age for its line. look at primo for babies. look at all the new duplo sets. look at the town jr crap. look at the emphisis on playsets e.g. adventurers... TLG: introduce more (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | | | In lugnet.general, Jonathan Wilson writes: <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> How is it that I, an AFOL, can spend $500 on Lego's in a single week and TLG doesn't feel that we are a viable target market? The reason SW sets have done so well is due to the theme and (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) !! I think that's a BIT of an exaggeration. I know I would. Especially since the shortages seem to be a thing of the past (knock on wood). So I'll put it to the group. If there is anyone that wants a Gungan Sub, I've got an extra one, and (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Well, I have to say, that this is what my 4.5 year old DOES want. I have witnessed him slowly drifting away from this and more toward building, but it's more on the order of swapping out details etc. of one truck, ship, etc. with new ones. We (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Ed Jones
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) I agree wholehearedly. Unfortunately, my other half won't let me do it the apartment. :') (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Gregor Benedikt Rochow
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I don't see how this is age-related, though. As a child, I never had all that many new sets with instructions, but rather just a lot of parts, from which I built mostly cars. Then and now, the main attraction for me is the ability to make (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) In my experience, kids buy the nicest looking model they can afford and do not usually consider the number or selection of pieces included. This is not an argument for Town Jr, though, because Town Jr. models are uglier than everything else (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | | | | No offense, but I disagree with nearly everything you wrote. And your shift key is in need of repair, as is your spell checker. jonathan wilson wrote in message ... (...) for (...) the (...) I think it makes sense that TLG is trying to aim at a (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | large sets / small sets —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Jonathan's assumption may be false, but the data you give below doesn't support the opposite. (...) Large sets are much more worthwhile for a store to ship back to the manufacturer, where they would get blown out of S@H over a number of years (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: large sets / small sets —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | | | | Oh boy, Todd and I at it again! Seems no matter where I post... there's Todd - like he owns the place or somethin! Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Twin (...) Okie dokie. Let me support big sets some more. First, it doesn't seem to me that (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: large sets / small sets —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I can hear it now..."Dude, did you see that in AucZilla VL, Old Man Lehman uncovered a bunch of city-center sets and he has those cool old 2x10x2 double sloped arch thingies with the 2x6 on top? It's sooooo uncool that TLG stopped making those (...) (26 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Soccer sets —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Yeow -- Having a bad day, Tom? We don't know for -sure- (like officially) that the SW bucket is for-sure totally totally cancelled. Just that LSI in Enfield told retailers that it was being pulled. TLG may still (God, let's hope!) change its (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Thomas Main
|
| | | | | | | (...) <snip> (...) I believe the cancellation of the Star Wars bucket may have prevented a lot of TLG flaming. Why? Did anyone ever consider what the contents of this bucket would have been? As far as I know, Lego never included "theme-type" pieces (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) That Star Wars toothpaste is absolutely *essential* if you want to brush your teeth wearing your Darth Vader Underoos. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) It sounds plausable to me (not their reasons for cancellation, but the fact that it may have been a FreeStyle bucket because of the name that S@H had for it: "3+ Star Wars Bucket"). But I'd still rather see a sucky juniorized SW bucket than (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) It could have been a purple bucket with a SW label on the front and no other difference. We would have railed at that as being stupid and opportunistic. (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | I won't be happy if it is. Think about it - the SW sets are heavy in dark grey plates, and orange, green, and purple bits. A bucket would have parts in colors we've never seen in buckets before. I could care less if it had any minifigs at all, as (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Simon Robinson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) They are? I haven't bought that many SW sets as I couldn't see many bricks in them I wanted. I only bought the landspeeders because of that intriguing light green plate and all the brown bricks. But I don't recall seeing any orange or purple (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | | | | | In lugnet.general, Simon Robinson writes: [sniper] (...) Orange: in de Snowspeeder among others.. HtH Mark "working on Ep1-sets to come to Europe" de Kock (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | The Mos Espa Pod Race has tons of new orange pieces, some new green pieces, and a couple new purple pieces. If it weren't $90, I'd have several by now. (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yea, I bought two based on price per part. Judging from Sebulba's racer (haven't built the others yet) I would say its a good buy. Assuming the Star Wars bucket followed some of the color patterns of the Star Wars set, it would be awsome. It (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Sports sets (was Re: Soccer sets) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | | (...) I could see these sports sets being big. They could sell them at the stadiums and have team-connected sets. More crossover business for Lego. I can just imagine the Michael Jordan minifig selling like crazy at Chicago Bulls games. (...) I (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Sports sets (was Re: Soccer sets) —Nick Goetz
|
| | | | | | | | Oh no!! It sounds like another one of those do they make the minifig with yellow skin threads. Christopher L. Weeks wrote in message <37305F0F.772008A7@c...ri.edu>... (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Soccer sets —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, and they weren't. Braindead marketing decision, IMNSHO. (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Ddddrrrrrrooo...ooollll! :-I.... (...) Methinks there's 4 red ones in 9355 too! --Todd (26 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | | | | | (...) Oh, yes. "Yeah! Baby..." That means I've got... <scrounge> <scrounge> 16 of them in grey. Ouch. Can that be right? <gulp> (...) Yep. That's true. I tried to buy that set not-too-long ago by mentioning it (hope against hope) to a local (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Mark de Kock
|
| | | | | | (...) Why is everyone drooling over them soccersets? Over here, you could get as much soccersets as you wanted. By the end of the promotion (by Shell), you could fill in an orderform with how much boxes you wanted... Mark "rubb it in" de Kock (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Ya ya, whatever. Now people are gonna go off and think I was wrong about something, Larritarianism will fade away as just another historical footnote, and it'll all be your fault. :-) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Joshua Delahunty
|
| | | | | (...) Originally, my post mentioned how 'Uncle Lare' had made a mistake; but I TRIED to deflect that fact by editing that out and hoping no-one would notice. ---- I was TRYING <sniff> to keep the dream uh-uh-aLIVE; but -- but YOU <sob> (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Terry Keller
|
| | | | | (...) And so the facade cracks........ -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) Whoa there, Nostradamus, not so fast. Why do you think God invented duct [1] tape;-) [1] Using the word"duck" to describe the tape, of course, would lead to the *dreaded* <cue reverb> Traademark diluution...'-) [2] [2] Oh, never mind me, I was (...) (26 years ago, 1-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) "double-plus good 99-5-3, LL speech: 1 error verified; corrected..." Wrong? Larry? Couldn't be. Steve (I have no idea what LL would stand for, but it looked more like BB than LP did.) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) As the Larritarians all know, the Larry is never wrong. It's obviously clear he was speaking of a currently unknown future set numbered 6339. Such utterances are often made seemingly in passing but come to pass nonetheless. Which is awesome (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Well, Tom, I'd amend this statement. Larry *was* wrong once... that was the time he *thought* he was wrong;-) [1] [1] that reminds me of my favorite story dilemma about the two guards and the two doors. Biters? -John (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Tom McDonald
|
| | | | (...) NO!! Say it isn't so! :( But you'll note he (purportedly) erred on the side of caution, and that is to be taken under consideration. So has there been any progress on firmly establishing the Larritarian rules for polygamy? :) (...) (26 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | *CAUTION* PUN AHEAD —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) The more the Marry her! ;-) (...) Ouch! (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) What? Sometimes The Larry will declare that you must play with more than one set at a time? I know this might shock some, but I've always been up for that. Some sets are really good at interfacing pleasantly with others for your enjoyment. (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) c /must/can/ * * < (1) > Larritarianism is about freedom, not strictness :-) (...) Yes. Indeed. I just built a doodlebug and it has a Naboo Fighter contributed engine in the engine compartment. GMLTC members will see it later tonite. Everyone (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Super LarryPad 4.01 beta 3 build 1138? --Todd (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I mean a real editor released by a real company. As a hint, this editor has well over 1 million users, at least 80% of which have no idea they're actually using it. (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Hmmm... Must be a Big Blue thing, eh? Umm, does it spot inside another application? -- is that how people don't know that they're spotning it? What kind of text data does it typically operate on? Is it special purpose? Does it spot on PCs or (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Jeremy H. Sproat
|
| | | | (...) You've got 14 questions left, but you've neglected to ask if it's a animal, plant, or mineral. Cheers, - jsproat (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Yes. (...) ?? Rephrase the question, what do you mean by "spot"? (...) ?? Rephrase the question, what do you mean by "spot"? (or SpotN in this case) (...) We won't hold you to "yes/no" questions! All kinds (...) No (...) ?? Rephrase the (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) Oh. Sorry. c /spot/run/ * * --Todd (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Ohmigawd, I can't believe I walked into that! A classic shaggy dog if there ever was one. (in more ways than one, so to speak :-)) But isn't that a pun and thus offtopic for .fun and thus subject to needing to be crossposted to .pun? Or don't (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 20Q (was Re: Prophecy (was Re: AucZILLA X: what is this item?) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, I guess it's kind-of a pun. No, all puns don't necessarily have to be force-crossposted to the .pun group. --Todd (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | |
