| |
Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> [removed lugnet.cad from crosspost list]
>
> In lugnet.general, radiotitan@yanospamhoo.com (Tom McDonald) writes:
> > In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > > In lugnet.general, jsproat@geocities.com (Sproaticus) writes:
> > > > Tom McDonald wrote:
> > > > > Thanks. I've got Legopalooza concert pictures coming soon probably
> > > > > in the next couple of weeks.
> > > >
> > > > Legopalooza - cool idea!
<snip>
> As awesome as it would be, I fear that if it was really used for something
> real, it'd probably be a heapin' helpin' of double trademark dilution (LEGO™
> & LALAPALOOZA™). :-{ :-{ Sure would be awesome though!
Well, since lollapalooza is a word in the English language, I don't see
how it could be trademarked.
--
Thomas Main
main@appstate.edu
>
> > I have to admit though that the name probably really doesn't fit my pictures
> > 100% perfectly but it gets the job done. You'll see why when I post them.
>
> Can't wait!
>
> --Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Brickenrocker Guitars
|
| (...) ^^^...^^^ (I think I misspelled this) (...) Trademarks don't have to be names or coined words. Actually, any word can pretty much be a trademark. For example, all of the following examples are well-known trademarks: Coined or derived words: (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickenrocker Guitars
|
| [removed lugnet.cad from crosspost list] (...) As awesome as it would be, I fear that if it was really used for something real, it'd probably be a heapin' helpin' of double trademark dilution (LEGO™ & LALAPALOOZA™). :-{ :-{ Sure would be awesome (...) (26 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
