Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf L.L.C.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 10 Mar 2002 16:19:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
351 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Michel Harnois writes:
> The fact that Lego's customer service has up until recently directed some of
> its callers to the Brickshelf's "Instructions and catalog scans", would, in my
> mind, seriously weaken their case against Brickshelf L.L.C. should the
> latter reinstate the online scan database with banner advertising. Lego has
> implicitly (tacitly) created a business-like relationship with Brickshelf
> and made it a pseudo-satellite entity within the Lego Group. I think it is
> Lego's responsibility to do one of the following:
>
> 1) Finance Brickshelf's bandwith and maintenance cost;
>
> 2) Take the bull by the horns and integrate the scans database to its own
> website (with Mr. Loch heading the project maybe?)
>
> In my opinion the Lego Group should promptly step foward and take action to
> help solve the situation. There is a strong demand out there for plans and
> catalog scans and I dont understand why Lego would not get involved. It
> would be mutualy advantageous to both them and the community.
I agree with you.
One other possibility that comes to my mind would be "de-centralize" the
resources: Brickshelf would have *links to* the instruction scans, that
would be hosted by volunteers in their web sites/pages(what if every LUGNET
member could lend some 5 MB? Would that be enough to solve the problem?)
Pedro
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Brickshelf L.L.C.
|
| The fact that Lego's customer service has up until recently directed some of its callers to the Brickshelf's "Instructions and catalog scans", would, in my mind, seriously weaken their case against Brickshelf L.L.C. should the latter reinstate the (...) (22 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.general)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
