 | | Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done) —Pedro Silva
|
| | | (...) Because the bloke never mentions "Airbus" as a plane brand... and currently it has more then 50% of the world plane market (commercial, medium-large). But I now see there is a mention to the SF earthquake, so it has to be post-1989... which (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | (...) See above. I actually rather like his take, but it was written in 1973 according to two sites where I found the essay. best LFB (24 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done) —Chris Leach
|
| | | | (...) Simple but in MANY cases true! (24 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done) —Pedro Silva
|
| | | | (...) The truth can be only one, but it can be seen from different angles. He had a quite dated point of view... and did not mention the full context of all the situations referred (which would not fit the paper...) Anyway, if he felt America was (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Good (!) editorial from Canada PLEASE READ (done) —Chris Leach
|
| | | | (...) :-)!!!!!!! (24 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
