Subject:
|
Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:36:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1805 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tim Courtney writes:
> In lugnet.general, Scott Arthur writes:
>
> > As a non-US citizen, it has been clear to me that there has been increased
> > scepticism towards the US since GWB came to power. If nothing else, this
> > heinous attack has demonstrated the folly of his foreign policy. He has
> > focussed overly on possible threats in the decades to come rather than
> > dealing with the one which exist today. The support the USA has received
> > from around the world in the last 20 hours or so has been considerable – and
> > a complete contrast to GWB’s isolationism.
>
> This is absolutely no time for armchair speculation,
I see no speculation in the text above?
> and no time to
> criticize the President.
>
> Perhaps you haven't seen the general concensus of a moratorium on debates
> concerning the attacks yet (in o-t.debate),
Hardly a "general consensus". I shall remind you that I was reply to an
apparent call for revenge. Not speaking about these issue here, or even at
our coffee breaks, will solve nothing. If people do not want to read about
it, I urge them not to read the messages with associated headers, not to buy
a newspaper or switch on the TV. It is our very right to talk about these
issues and others that the perpetrators of yesterdays act would like to be
taken away. I would positively encourage objective debate of the issues
here. I don’t want links to video footage, only debate
> but quite frankly I am offended
> by such a post at this point in time.
You will have to sit in a darkened room for quite a while. The media is full
of far worse. Personally, I am offended by the appetite for the re-runs of
pictures of the destruction of human life.
> From your comfy chair across the
> pond, and even from my comfy chair in Chicago, there's NO WAY for either you
> or I to understand the HELL those people went through yesterday, and are
> still going through. So SHOW SOME RESPECT by not debating and throwing your
> usual criticism at our American leaders.
I was showing respect for calling for a non-violent response. I am tempted
to take apart what you have written above, but I will not.
Scott A
>
> Long live America
>
> -Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) This is absolutely no time for armchair speculation, and no time to criticize the President. Perhaps you haven't seen the general concensus of a moratorium on debates concerning the attacks yet (in o-t.debate), but quite frankly I am offended (...) (23 years ago, 12-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
