Subject:
|
Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:09:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3138 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richard Noeckel writes:
> In lugnet.general, Matthew Gerber writes:
> > NEWS:
> > All international US embassies, bases, etc. on Delta alert.
>
>
> Question; is 'Delta Alert' the same as 'Def Con 1' ?
> (I may have misspelled 'def con')
> Does ~Def Con~ range from 1 to 5, and 1 being the worst?
Not really sure...seems about right...
The Delta Alerts seem to be the nomenclature built on Americas newer defense
plans, as created just a few years ago.
Matt
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| NEWS: Palastinian Head Representative in US, Hasan Rahman: Palastinians should not be celebrating. Why should Americans NOT believe me when I say that the Taliban had no hand in the attacks? Do not attribute actions of a few teenagers in the streets (...) (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) I think (and I have no internal knowledge of US armed forces) that defcon 1 is actual war, while the alert levels are just that - letting security forces know something may be up... Dan (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Terrorist Attacks on America
|
| (...) Question; is 'Delta Alert' the same as 'Def Con 1' ? (I may have misspelled 'def con') Does ~Def Con~ range from 1 to 5, and 1 being the worst? -R (23 years ago, 11-Sep-01, to lugnet.general)
|
133 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
