To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 31672
31671  |  31673
Subject: 
Re: Gallery speed
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:48:07 GMT
Viewed: 
1011 times
  
I've also noticed on occasion when I click the "random folder" (great
feature!!) a folder will display with the dreaded red "x" (no image available),
and I can't click on it. Maybe this is related?

ROSCO

In lugnet.general, Geoffrey Hyde writes:
Both myself and the original poster were mystified as to why this link
didn't work for me - have you any idea as to why not?

http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=5229

"Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message
news:GG0H6J.ALE@lugnet.com...
I think I've fixed the painfully slow performance of the "recent" page.
There were some indexes missing in the database that really should have
been there.  It loads reasonably fast now (~.8 seconds unless the
machine is really busy).

If there are any database wizards out there, maybe you can help make it
even faster.

here's the "slow" query that is currently limiting performance:

SELECT DISTINCT file_parent FROM files ORDER BY file_modify_time DESC • LIMIT 24

each file_parent is then used to retrieve a folder record with icon • information
etc.  Those 24 queries are extremely fast (0.01 secs ea) so that's not the
problem.  I do have indexes for file parent and file_modify_time.

Most queryies return ~instantly (0.01 secs), but the above query returns
in 0.76 seconds.  Is there a faster way to do this?

It would be much faster to do this:
SELECT * FROM files ORDER BY file_modify_time DESC LIMIT 24

but that would include empty folders.

omitting the DISTINCT above causes it to return instanly but with many
duplicates, since there is often more than one new image per folder.

KL



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Gallery speed
 
Both myself and the original poster were mystified as to why this link didn't work for me - have you any idea as to why not? (URL) ... Geoffrey Hyde "Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message news:GG0H6J.ALE@lugnet.com... (...) LIMIT 24 (...) (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

7 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR