Subject:
|
Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:36:09 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm./spamcake/org
|
Viewed:
|
2824 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote:
> leave it at that. I've even heard Kia commercials that say "check out the
> Kia's at your local Kia dealership."
I think that technically, they're misusing their own trademark there.
> Even LEGO, for that matter, can serve as a noun; for instance, one might
> say "I collect LEGO" or "I received LEGO as a birthday gift." It *can* be
> an adjective, but it isn't exclusively so. I understand your point about
Well, this is actually _exactly_ what the Susan Williams message is trying
to discourage. The Lego Company doesn't want you to use their trademark as a
noun. You should say "I collect LEGO building blocks" or somesuch.
[Not sure this belongs in .off-topic.[anything]. So not respecting followup]
--
Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 20 Years of TLC's Frustration with "LEGOS"
|
| (...) Just as a minor clarification, it's not entirely accurate to say that all trademarks are adjectives. Kia's "Sportage" serves both as a trademark and a noun, insofar as one doesn't say "I'm driving my Kia Sportage sport utility vehicle." It's (...) (23 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.general)
|
137 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
