 | | Re: Article from Tommorow ("Switchtrack") < Warning Speculative!!> —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
|
| | | (...) though..> [snip alot] Nice ideas, but not too probable since Lego uses 9V direct current and Märklin always used alternating current... I think there would be no advantage for these two companies to develop a new dcc system. If Lego ever does (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Article from Tommorow ("Switchtrack") < Warning Speculative!!> —Harvey Henkelman
|
| | | | | (...) Even if LEGO should develop a DCC system with kids in mind, it's far better to control more than one engine and a few points (turnouts) than none at all. We must be grateful for what we do receive, in my opinion. -Harvey (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Article from Tommorow ("Switchtrack") < Warning Speculative!!> —Alex Farlie
|
| | | | <Warning!! This post contains speculative musings on possible new products. These are enclosed by <FUTURE></FUTURE> tags..> (...) <FUTURE> One of the 'technical' differences between Marklin's system and Lego Mindstroms that the joint design tema had (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
