Subject:
|
Re: A new scan for 371 (some proof?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Apr 2000 08:44:40 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
ssgore@superonline.com&Spamcake&
|
Viewed:
|
3516 times
|
| |
|
|
Gary Istok wrote:
>
> Jason Proksch wrote:
>
> <major snippage>
>
> > I am now leaning more toward the first 2 options. Perhaps the poor quality
> > reflects Samsonites inability to match lego's quality. Come to think of it, my
> > #717? Samsonite has some errors (or inconsistencies) in its instructions as
> > well.
>
>
> Did someone say "Junior Constructor"? Set 717.....
Muwahahh..:-) I knew that Gary would jump on this..:-) You make a lugnet
search for "junior 717" everyday, don't you?..:-)
Selçuk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A new scan for 371 (some proof?)
|
| Jason Proksch wrote: <major snippage> (...) Did someone say "Junior Constructor"? Set 717..... from 1961-64. Is that the one you are talking about Jason (by the way, glad you decided to "de-lurk"). If so, are you talking about the earlier gabled (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.general)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
