 | | Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) —John Robert Blaze Kanehl
|
| | | (...) I apoligize for the last post.....cat on keyboard..... The new packaging is a far cry from the "compartmentalized geek" boxes I loved as a kid.....To this day I still have the boxes to Universal Building sets 745 (1976?) and 733 (1979?). They (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | "John Robert Blaze Kanehl" <johnNYblaze44@webtv.net> wrote in message news:FpCLvJ.K12@lugnet.com... (...) the whole (...) Building (...) storage (...) frames.....an (...) I think the styroofoam is OK as long as you don't throw it away! Who could (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | (...) speaking of... My sister got me that new big ~800 piece basic set for Christmas. It's the one with six or seven smaller boxes of lego held together by a cardboard frame. It seems like a waste of packaging to me, especially the raised baseplate (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | (...) Was this the K-Mart exclusive? The one with the 32x32 light green baseplate like 5978's? I didn't have any trouble getting the boxes out of the two copies I got... :) Jeff (URL) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) No, I got my first copy at Zany Brainy. I think I've seen it at Wal-Mart, and perhaps TRU also. (25 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| | | | |
